REGISTER
LOG IN
HOME
RESOURCES
Publications
Conference Calendar
Past Quiz Results
ARTICLES
Revisiting ISHAM Asia 2021
The first AFWG CaseClinic is now live!
First-ever Study of Mycology Lab Practices in Asia
New Diagnostic Mycology E-learning Course
Antifungal prophylaxis: Whom, what and when
Fereydounia khargensis: A New Opportunistic Yeast Reported from Malaysia
9 Years of MMTN: Improving Fungal Disease Management in Asia Pacific
Echinocandins: Clinicians' Guide
Five controversies in mycology
Fungemia blood culture media
Deep dermatophytosis
AFWG Education Module 4: Is Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Useful for Clinical Management?
AFWG Education Module 5: TDM of Antifungal Agents - Essential or Optional?
AFWG Education Module 6: Antifungal Stewardship
10 common mistakes in laboratory mycology
Itraconazole: A Quick Guide for Clinicians
Evolving Fungal Landscape in Asia
10 common mistakes in clinical mycology
Laboratory Diagnosis of Pythiosis
ICMR Issues C. auris Advisory
Strengths and Limitations of Imaging for Diagnosis of IFI
Candidemia: Lessons Learned from Asian Studies for Intervention
Spotting invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in COVID-19 patients
Pivotal Asian Invasive Mold Study
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on IFI epidemiology and trends
Mycetoma in Asia: Still veiled in mystery
Cryptococcosis
Identifying IFI risk factors in patients with COVID-19
ASID ANZMIG x AFWG: Fungal Frontiers in the Asia Pacific – Webinar 2
New Antifungal Agents
Gilead IFI Masterclass: Current updates on the management of IFIs in immunocompromised hosts
The AFWG Masterclass: Advanced fungal education at your fingertips
A challenging case: A crisis unfolds
The role of antifungal stewardship in improving IFI outcomes
Making Precise Diagnoses: Experience from the Laboratory Skills Enhancement Course
A challenging case: A 68-year-old man with nasal and palatal ulcers
AFWG Online Education Module 3: Optimizing Dosing in IFI Management
AFWG Online Education Module 2: Antifungal Prophylaxis in Solid Organ Transplantation
AFWG Education Module 1: The Value of Clinical Mycology Laboratories
How do I interpret Candida in the urine?
How do I interpret Candida in respiratory tract cultures?
Cryptococcosis in HIV and non-HIV infected patients
Human Pythiosis
AFWGOnline Privacy Policy has been Updated
Management of fungal infections in high-risk patients
Striving for Perfection: Experience from the Laboratory Foundation Training Course
Know your fungal landscape in Vietnam
Recent Advances of Fungal Diagnostics in Asian Laboratories
Deep Dermatophytosis: A Case Report
Management of cryptococcosis and talaromycosis
A challenging case: A 49-year-old woman with sarcoidosis
Emerging yeast infections in Asia
Outbreak of Superbug Candida auris: Asian Scenario and Interventions
Championing Medical Mycology: Thoughts on the AFWG Laboratory Skills Enhancement Course
Mucormycosis and Pythiosis – New Insights
AML and the high risk of multiple infectious complications
Do We Need Modification of Recent IDSA & ECIL Guidelines while Managing Patients in Asia?
A hospital’s experience with candidemia and empirical therapy
Top 5 most viewed AFWG videos on YouTube
Fungal Academy 2015
Fluconazole in 2015
Fungal isolation protocol
Influencing Aspergillus
Fungal Asthma
Aspergillus
Laboratory Diagnosis of IPA
Two-Hot-to-Handle
Voriconazole
Educational Organizations
Literature Updates
 

Articles

The Role Of Antifungal Stewardship In Improving IFI Outcomes

Share this
page



Share
this page

The need for antifungal stewardship

The global burden of invasive and severe fungal diseases is massive, with over 3 million chronic severe infections globally and an annual incidence of at least 1.9 million acute invasive fungal infections (IFIs).1 IFIs mostly affect immunosuppressed or critically ill individuals, and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and increased healthcare costs.2,3

Timely initiation and the judicious use of appropriate antifungal therapy are crucial to the successful management of IFI. At present, up to half of antifungal prescriptions are unnecessary or inappropriate,3 in part due to the limited sensitivity of fungal diagnostics. Additionally, the choice of antifungal therapy in many institutions is often limited by their cost, toxicity profile or their availability. The lack of effective and timely fungal diagnostic tools could lead to significant delays in targeted treatment, which inadvertently increases the risk of overexposure to potentially toxic agents, antifungal resistance and poor patient outcomes.2 Together, these factors outline the importance of multidisciplinary antifungal stewardship (AFS), which is increasingly being recognized in the pursuit of optimizing antifungal therapy and improving the outcomes of patients with IFI.2

AFS refers to coordinated interventions to monitor and direct the appropriate use of antifungal agents with the aim of achieving optimal clinical outcomes, minimizing selective pressure and reducing the occurrence of adverse events.2,4 AFS is an emerging component of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), with which it shares goals and principles for guiding therapy. However, AFS faces a number of unique challenges, such as2,4:

  • difficulties in diagnosis, eg, poor sensitivity of culture-based microbiologic tests and non-specific clinical manifestations of IFIs (in immunocompromised patients);
  • the lack of consensus on management and de-escalation methodologies; and
  • limited antifungal resistance reporting 

Core elements of AFS 

An international consensus panel developed a set of core elements of any AMS (and AFS) program, which includes3:

  1. Engagement of the senior hospital management leadership towards AFS, including accountability and dedicated resources to support AFS activities
  2. Accountability and responsibilities of a highly functioning, experienced multidisciplinary AFS team, including infectious disease (ID) physicians, ID-trained pharmacists and other key healthcare personnel managing these diseases
  3. Available expertise on infection management, including access to timely conventional and non-culture-based diagnostic testing for Candida and Aspergillus species
  4. Education and practical training through targeted programs to address knowledge gaps
  5. Actions aiming at responsible antimicrobial use, such as ID consultation for patients with IFI and development of treatment bundles or guidelines
  6. Monitoring, surveillance and reporting of fungal infections with access to timely antifungal susceptibility testing
  7. Reporting and feedback mechanisms to track antifungal drug use

To have a successful AFS program, establishing a core set of metrics/performance measures that reflect the impact of the program is important; data-driven approaches have been shown to aid stewardship programs in optimizing antimicrobial use (Table 1).2,3

Table 1. Proposed metrics for measuring the impact of AFS2,3

Outcome

Examples of metrics

Antifungal consumption

DDD/1,000 patient days

Days of therapy/1,000 patient days

Length of therapy

Antifungal prescribing quality

Number of antifungal prescriptions reviewed

Number of treatment modifications recommended

Appropriate choice of antifungal agent

Diagnosis

Appropriate diagnostic test used

Turnaround time for results

Follow-up cultures until negative result

Microbiological

Causative organisms/species

Antifungal resistance

Time to microbiological clearance

Clinical

Incidence of IFI

IFI-related mortality

Hospital length of stay

Cost

Antifungal prescription cost

Diagnostic cost

Other AFS implementation cost

AFS, antifungal stewardship; DDD, defined daily dose; IFI, invasive fungal infections

Conclusion

As the populations at risk for IFIs continue to expand, the need for AFS programs to monitor and prevent severe fungal infection becomes even more pressing. An effective AFS program, backed by core elements and data-driven measures, can help optimize antifungal prescribing and IFI management.

References

  1. Bongomin F, et al. J Fungi (Basel) 2017;3:57.
  2. Chakrabarti A, et al. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9:ofac234.
  3. Johnson MD, et al. J Infect Dis 2020;222(Suppl 3):S175-S198.
  4. Khanina A, et al. Intern Med J 2021;51(Suppl 7):18-36.
SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTER
SIGN UP

This field is required. Please enter your email address.
Thank you for signing up for the AFWG newsletter.
Your subscription has been updated.